{"id":22859,"date":"2025-12-06T15:24:34","date_gmt":"2025-12-06T14:24:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/eu-regulation-amlr-micar-dac8-explained\/"},"modified":"2025-12-06T15:24:36","modified_gmt":"2025-12-06T14:24:36","slug":"eu-regulation-amlr-micar-dac8-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/eu-regulation-amlr-micar-dac8-explained\/","title":{"rendered":"EU regulation: AMLR, MiCAR & DAC8 explained"},"content":{"rendered":"
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762863705389{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;background-color: #6193C9 !important;}”]\n

EU regulation: AMLR, MiCAR & DAC8 explained<\/span><\/strong><\/h1>\n

– <\/span><\/strong><\/h1>\n

What Bitcoin payments mean in practice<\/span><\/strong><\/h1>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

In recent weeks, numerous false reports about the EU anti-money laundering package (AMLR)<\/strong> have been making the rounds again.
One read about an alleged “compulsory ID card for every Bitcoin transaction” or even the end of peer-to-peer payments in Europe.<\/p>\n

But what is really behind it all?
And what does all this mean in concrete terms for Bitcoin payments in everyday life<\/strong> – i.e. for payers and merchants?<\/p>\n

So it’s time to set the record straight and explain the wider context<\/strong> of MiCAR<\/strong> and DAC8<\/strong> and why self-custody<\/strong> is more important than ever.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

MiCAR, AMLR & DAC8 – The new EU crypto triangle<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

Three new EU legislative packages will interlock in future:<\/p>\n

\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Rules and regulations<\/th>\nFocus<\/th>\nAffected parties<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
MiCAR<\/strong> (Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation)<\/td>\nUniform EU rules for crypto service providers (license, consumer protection, stablecoins)<\/td>\nExchanges, custodians, issuers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
AMLR<\/strong> (Anti-Money Laundering Regulation)<\/td>\nMeasures against money laundering & terrorist financing (KYC, wallet check, privacy coin ban)<\/td>\nBanks, CASPs, financial service providers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
DAC8<\/strong> (Directive on Administrative Cooperation 8)<\/td>\nTax transparency and automatic exchange of information on crypto transactions<\/td>\nCASPs, tax authorities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

MiCAR<\/strong> regulates who is considered a crypto service provider.
AMLR<\/strong> prescribes auditing obligations and customer identification for these service providers.
DAC8 finally ensures the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities.<\/p>\n

\ud83d\udc49 Together, they form the EU’s attempt to monitor cryptocurrencies more closely and embed them in the traditional financial system.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

No ID required for every Bitcoin transaction<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

The fact is:
There is no general ID requirement for every Bitcoin payment.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The new rules only<\/strong> apply to regulated service providers (CASPs)<\/strong> – e.g. exchanges, custodians or payment providers that hold crypto on behalf of others.<\/p>\n

However, anyone who controls<\/strong> their own keys<\/strong> (self-custody) is not a CASP<\/strong> and is therefore not subject to these regulations<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

Due diligence obligations of service providers for payments with self-custody wallets<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

The AMLR requires service providers (CASPs<\/strong>) to perform certain checks when sending or receiving money to or from a self-managed wallet<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762860443730{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

    \n
  • Under \u20ac1,000:<\/strong>
    A risk-based analysis<\/strong> is sufficient – e.g. automated blockchain analysis.<\/li>\n
  • Over \u20ac1,000:<\/strong>
    The service provider must check whether the wallet actually belongs to its customer, for example by means of the so-called Satoshi test<\/strong> (a small test transaction).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]\n

    This verification obligation applies exclusively to the service provider<\/strong>, not the individual payer or merchant.
    If both parties use self-custody<\/strong>, no verification<\/strong> takes place – because there is no regulated third party<\/strong> that would be obliged to do so.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

    Practical example: The pizzeria and its Bitcoin payments<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

    Imagine the pizzeria around the corner<\/strong> accepts Bitcoin.
    How the AMLR works depends on who uses which wallet<\/strong>:<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

    1. both sides use self-custody<\/span><\/h3>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

    The customer pays with their own wallet (e.g. Phoenix, BitBox).
    The payments end up directly in the pizzeria’s own wallet<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762860791064{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

      \n
    • \n

      No exchange, no payment service provider in between.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      Peer-to-peer payment<\/strong> in the original sense.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      No AMLR check, no data collection, no reporting obligation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]This is how Bitcoin works as it was intended – decentralized, private and without middlemen.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

      2. customer pays from a custody wallet (e.g. stock exchange account)<\/span><\/h3>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

      The customer pays from their exchange account. A regulated service provider is involved here – the stock exchange.
      According to the AMLR, it must check where the money is sent. <\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762863596364{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

        \n
      • Under \u20ac1,000: automatic risk analysis.<\/li>\n
      • Over \u20ac1,000: additional verification possible.<\/li>\n
      • The pizzeria is not affected<\/strong> – the obligation lies with the payer’s exchange<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

        3. pizzeria uses a custody payment provider<\/span><\/h3>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

        In this case, the pizzeria uses an external payment provider<\/strong> for its Bitcoin payments, which processes<\/strong> the transactions technically and financially<\/strong> – such as BitPay<\/strong> or OpenNode<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]\n

        What does a custody payment provider do?<\/strong><\/p>\n

        Such a provider stores the Bitcoin balance on behalf of the trader<\/strong>.
        This means:<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762861393531{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

          \n
        • \n

          Incoming Bitcoin payments do not<\/strong> end up directly in the merchant’s wallet<\/strong>, but first in a wallet that is controlled by the provider<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          The provider stores<\/strong> these Bitcoin(custody<\/em>) and can automatically exchange<\/strong> them for euros<\/strong> if required.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        • \n

          He then credits the euro amount to the merchant’s bank account<\/strong> or holds the Bitcoin balance in trust on behalf of the merchant.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]What does this mean legally?<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762861455178{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

            \n
          • \n

            The payment provider is considered a Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) <\/strong>and is fully subject to AMLR<\/strong> and DAC8<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            It must identify <\/strong>its customers (i.e. the merchant) (KYC <\/strong>) and check and document<\/strong> transactions.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            Wallet verification is mandatory for amounts over \u20ac1,000<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            The provider may also be obliged to report transaction data to tax authorities.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]What does this mean for the retailer?<\/strong>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762861512658{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

              \n
            • The pizzeria itself does not have to<\/strong> carry out any checks<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
            • However, it no longer works in a peer-to-peer model<\/strong>, but within a regulated and monitored system<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
            • The merchant has no direct control over the Bitcoin received<\/strong> as long as it is held by the payment provider.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]\n

              Custody payment providers such as BitPay<\/strong> or OpenNode<\/strong> make Bitcoin payments convenient, but lead them into a centralized, monitored system<\/strong> with KYC and reporting obligations.
              Those who want to maintain independence and privacy should therefore rely on self-custody solutions<\/strong> such as BTCPay Server<\/strong> or Coinsnap <\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

              4. both sides use custody providers<\/span><\/h3>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

              If the customer pays from an exchange wallet and the pizzeria receives via a custody payment provider, two regulated service providers<\/strong> are involved.<\/p>\n

              In this case, both providers<\/strong> must fulfill their verification obligations and inform each other about the sender and recipient – this is done via the so-called travel rule<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

              5. merchant with self-custody payment provider<\/span><\/h3>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

              Many merchants today use solutions such as BTCPay Server<\/strong> or Coinsnap in the self-custody version<\/strong>, where the Bitcoin received flows directly into their own wallet<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

              \u27a1 A dvantages:<\/strong><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762861786218{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

                \n
              • \n

                No third-party custody \u2192 no CASP \u2192 no AMLR or DAC8 obligation.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              • \n

                Full control over your own funds.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              • \n

                Data protection-friendly and independent.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                DAC8 – The new tax reporting obligation for crypto<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                With DAC8, the EU obliges all crypto service providers<\/strong> to automatically<\/strong> transmit tax-relevant information to the tax authorities<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

                This includes:<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762862106786{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

                  \n
                • \n

                  Identity data (name, address, tax ID)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                • \n

                  Type, number and value of crypto assets traded<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                • \n

                  Timing of transactions<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                • \n

                  Account balances at the end of the year<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                  This data is exchanged between EU member states<\/strong> so that national tax authorities have a complete overview of citizens’ crypto activities.<\/p>\n

                  The rationale: to prevent tax evasion.<\/strong>
                  The reality: the end of tax privacy for crypto users.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                  The DAC8<\/strong> only<\/strong> requires regulated service providers (CASPs)<\/strong> to report transaction and customer data to the tax authorities.<\/p>\n

                  Self-custody users are not<\/strong> affected by this.
                  Those who hold their own keys remain outside the DAC8 reporting obligation<\/strong> – but must of course pay tax on their income correctly<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                  DAC8 in practice: The pizzeria question<\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                  A reader recently asked a very good question:<\/p>\n

                  \n

                  “Does DAC8 also have an impact on the pizzeria around the corner that sells pizzas for sats? Or on small donations in Bitcoin?”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

                  No.<\/strong>
                  As long as the pizzeria receives Bitcoin directly into its own wallet<\/strong>, it does not fall under DAC8<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

                  Only if a custodian payment provider<\/strong> is involved does it have to report the transaction data – not the merchant itself.<\/p>\n

                  \n

                  Overview<\/h2>\n
                  \n
                  \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
                  Scenario<\/th>\nParties involved<\/th>\nWho is obliged?<\/th>\nAMLR check?<\/th>\nDAC8 notification?<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
                  Customer & merchant with self-custody (e.g. BTCPay Server, Coinsnap <\/td>\nno CASPs<\/td>\nnobody<\/td>\n\u274c No<\/td>\n\u274c No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
                  Customer (Custody) \u2192 Retailer (Self-Custody)<\/td>\n1 CASP<\/td>\nProvider of the customer<\/td>\n\u2705 Yes<\/td>\n\u2705 Yes (customer side)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
                  Customer (self-custody) \u2192 Merchant (custody provider)<\/td>\n1 CASP<\/td>\nPayment provider<\/td>\n\u2705 Yes<\/td>\n\u2705 Yes (merchant side)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
                  Both Custody<\/td>\n2 CASPs<\/td>\nBoth providers<\/td>\n\u2705 Yes, on both sides<\/td>\n\u2705 Yes, on both sides<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                  Recommendation: Rely on self-custody and peer-to-peer payments<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                  Anyone who uses Bitcoin as it was intended<\/strong> uses it peer-to-peer<\/strong> – directly from person to person, without middlemen, without authorizations, without censorship.<\/p>\n

                  Self-custody solutions<\/strong> such as BTCPay Server<\/strong> or Coinsnap <\/strong>allow exactly that:<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762862038551{margin-left: 50px !important;}”]\n

                    \n
                  • complete control over its own funds,<\/li>\n
                  • no disclosure of personal data,<\/li>\n
                  • Protection of privacy,<\/li>\n
                  • Independence from banks, stock exchanges and state supervision<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                    Conclusion:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                    \n

                    Those who hold their own keys remain free – legally, technically and financially.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

                    Bitcoin only works as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system<\/strong> if payers and merchants control<\/strong> their own wallet<\/strong>.
                    This is the only way for Bitcoin to remain sustainable, censorship-resistant and sovereign<\/strong>.<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1738351904557{border-top-width: 3px !important;border-right-width: 3px !important;border-bottom-width: 3px !important;border-left-width: 3px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;border-left-style: solid !important;border-right-style: solid !important;border-top-style: solid !important;border-bottom-style: solid !important;border-color: #6193C9 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                    Positive trend: lightning wallets rely on self-custody<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””]\n

                    A positive trend is already emerging:
                    More and more Bitcoin and lightning wallets<\/strong> are switching to self-custody<\/strong> – and thus consistently following the original Bitcoin idea.<\/p>\n

                    For example, the Wallet of Satoshi<\/strong> recently announced that it would restrict its services in regulated markets and encourage users to manage their own keys<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

                    Other wallets such as Phoenix<\/strong>, Zeus<\/strong> or MistyBreez <\/strong>are already completely non-custodial<\/strong>, so that users retain full control over their funds at all times.<\/p>\n

                    This development is a direct consequence of the new legal requirements:
                    The more regulations focus on monitoring, mandatory reporting and control, the more awareness of genuine self-custody<\/strong> grows – among payers as well as merchants<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

                    \u26a1 Self-custody wallets<\/strong> are therefore not only a technical advance, but also an answer to excessive regulation<\/strong>.
                    They strengthen privacy<\/strong>, promote financial sovereignty <\/strong>and make Bitcoin payments what they should be again:
                    a free, decentralized and borderless means of payment.<\/strong><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                    [vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1762863705389{padding-top: 30px !important;padding-bottom: 30px !important;background-color: #6193C9 !important;}”] EU regulation: AMLR, MiCAR & DAC8 explained – What Bitcoin payments mean […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":22748,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[55,111,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bitcoin-en","category-payment-processing","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22859"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22859\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22861,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22859\/revisions\/22861"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coincharge.io\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}